Re: SR slaves and .pgpass

From: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: SR slaves and .pgpass
Date: 2010-06-11 10:14:10
Message-ID: 4C120C72.5000607@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 09/06/10 08:24, Fujii Masao wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 12:52 PM, Andrew Dunstan<andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
>> There is precedent for .pgpass being a bit ambiguous. See the way
>> "localhost" is used.
>
> OK. The attached patch allows us to use "replication" in the database
> field of the .pgpass file, for the replication connection.

Thanks, committed with some rewording of the docs and comments. I hope I
made them better, not worse.

--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2010-06-11 10:25:38 Re: vacuum_defer_cleanup_age
Previous Message Leonardo F 2010-06-11 07:43:16 Re: Error with GIT Repository