From: | Anne Rosset <arosset(at)collab(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Jochen Erwied <jochen(at)pgsql-performance(dot)erwied(dot)eu> |
Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Need to increase performance of a query |
Date: | 2010-06-10 19:44:54 |
Message-ID: | 4C1140B6.5020803@collab.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Jochen Erwied wrote:
> Thursday, June 10, 2010, 9:34:07 PM you wrote:
>
>
>> Time: 1.516 ms
>>
>
>
>> Time: 13.177 ms
>>
>
> I'd suppose the first query to scan a lot less rows than the second one.
> Could you supply an explained plan for the fast query?
>
>
Hi Jochen,
Here is the explained plan for the fastest query:
psrdb=# explain analyze ELECT
psrdb-# MAX(item_rank.rank) AS maxRank
psrdb-# FROM
psrdb-# item_rank item_rank
psrdb-# WHERE
psrdb-# item_rank.pf_id='plan1408';
ERROR: syntax error at or near "ELECT" at character 17
psrdb=# explain analyze SELECT
psrdb-# MAX(item_rank.rank) AS maxRank
psrdb-# FROM
psrdb-# item_rank item_rank
psrdb-# WHERE
psrdb-# item_rank.pf_id='plan1408';
QUERY PLAN
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Aggregate (cost=8.28..8.29 rows=1 width=8) (actual time=0.708..0.709
rows=1 loops=1)
-> Index Scan using item_rank_pf on item_rank (cost=0.00..8.27
rows=1 width=8) (actual time=0.052..0.407 rows=303 loops=1)
Index Cond: ((pf_id)::text = 'plan1408'::text)
Total runtime: 0.761 ms
(4 rows)
Time: 2.140 ms
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Craig James | 2010-06-10 19:47:07 | Re: Need to increase performance of a query |
Previous Message | Anne Rosset | 2010-06-10 19:42:21 | Re: Need to increase performance of a query |