From: | Mark Kirkwood <mark(dot)kirkwood(at)catalyst(dot)net(dot)nz> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: File system choice for Red Hat systems |
Date: | 2010-06-02 22:13:29 |
Message-ID: | 4C06D789.7070906@catalyst.net.nz |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On 03/06/10 02:53, Alan Hodgson wrote:
> On Tuesday 01 June 2010, Mark Kirkwood<mark(dot)kirkwood(at)catalyst(dot)net(dot)nz>
> wrote:
>
>> I'm helping set up a Red Hat 5.5 system for Postgres. I was going to
>> recommend xfs for the filesystem - however it seems that xfs is
>> supported as a technology preview "layered product" for 5.5. This
>> apparently means that the xfs tools are only available via special
>> channels.
>>
>> What are Red Hat using people choosing for a good performing filesystem?
>>
>>
> I've run PostgreSQL on XFS on CentOS for years. It works well. Make sure you
> have a good battery-backed RAID controller under it (true for all
> filesystems).
>
>
Thanks - yes, left to myself I would consider using Centos instead.
However os choice is prescribed in this case I believe.
Cheers
Mark
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kevin Grittner | 2010-06-02 22:25:26 | Re: SELECT ignoring index even though ORDER BY and LIMIT present |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2010-06-02 21:26:35 | Re: Certain query eating up all free memory (out of memory error) |