Re: [RFC] A tackle to the leaky VIEWs for RLS

From: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com, sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net
Subject: Re: [RFC] A tackle to the leaky VIEWs for RLS
Date: 2010-06-01 09:08:37
Message-ID: 4C04CE15.4010902@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 01/06/10 11:39, KaiGai Kohei wrote:
> Any operators eventually invokes a function
> being correctly installed, but an assumption is that we can trust operators,
> index access method, type input/output methods, conversions and so on, because
> these features have to be installed by DBA (or initdb).

Operators can be created by regular users.

--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2010-06-01 09:23:05 Re: functional call named notation clashes with SQL feature
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2010-06-01 09:00:23 Re: BUG #5487: dblink failed with 63 bytes connection names