Re: Specification for Trusted PLs?

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Specification for Trusted PLs?
Date: 2010-05-21 16:12:42
Message-ID: 4BF6B0FA.1090602@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 05/21/2010 11:57 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 11:55 AM, Josh Berkus<josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
>> So, here's a working definition:
>>
>> 1) cannot directly read or write files on the server.
>> 2) cannot bind network ports
>
> To make that more covering, don't yu really need something like
> "cannot communicate with outside processes"?

So, no interprocess communication except through the SPI interface? How
do module GUCs and things like %_SHARED fit into this?

--
-- Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://www.pgexperts.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Fetter 2010-05-21 16:22:20 Re: Specification for Trusted PLs?
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2010-05-21 15:57:33 Re: Specification for Trusted PLs?