| From: | Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc> |
|---|---|
| To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Clarifications of licences on pgfoundry |
| Date: | 2010-05-20 18:25:59 |
| Message-ID: | 4BF57EB7.8050701@kaltenbrunner.cc |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 05/20/2010 01:58 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
> On 05/18/2010 01:57 AM, Simon Riggs wrote:
>> I notice that there are more than a few projects on pgfoundry that are
>> marked as "BSD licence" but then the project files don't contain any
>> mention of the licence details. In some cases, projects are also clearly
>> marked Copyright of people or organizations.
>
> yeah, this is due to one of many bugs with gForge. The submitter is
> required to choose a license on submission of a project request ... but
> that information is then discarded and doesn't end up in the project page.
huh? that does not make any sense at all - the licence the submitter
chooses _IS_ displayed on the main overview page of the project (see for
example: http://pgfoundry.org/projects/pgbouncer/).
Stefan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2010-05-20 19:06:31 | Re: Clarifications of licences on pgfoundry |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2010-05-20 18:12:13 | Re: Fwd: PGBuildfarm member colugos Branch HEAD Status changed from OK to StartDb-C:3 failure |