Re: pg_upgrade and extra_float_digits

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade and extra_float_digits
Date: 2010-05-17 01:27:48
Message-ID: 4BF09B94.60405@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Thank you. I understand now.
>
> Imagine finding out on the build farm right away when we break binary
> compatibility --- that would be cool.
>

I'm not saying we can't do that, just that it will not be a trivial
change. And yes it would be cool, although I hope we would know before
we committed such a change that that would be the outcome.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2010-05-17 01:30:15 Re: Row-level Locks & SERIALIZABLE transactions, postgres vs. Oracle
Previous Message Robert Haas 2010-05-17 01:25:41 Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful)