Re: List traffic

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: List traffic
Date: 2010-05-14 16:51:11
Message-ID: 4BED7F7F.6000703@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin pgsql-chat pgsql-general pgsql-hackers


>> There is no reason why advocacy can't happen on general. Theoretically
>> www could be on hackers (although I do see the point of a separate
>> list).

First off, this is absolutely the wrong list to be discussing management
of PostgreSQL lists. That belongs on pgsql-www. And, I'll point out,
that this completely pointless discussion on the wrong list has been 1/6
of the traffic on -hackers for the last two days. Also, I really don't
see what problem people think they're addressing with these bimonthly
calls for list consolidation. It seems like a solution in search of a
problem.

So it's an exercise in ironic wankitude. Can we please stop it now?

Second, regarding advocacy: no, absolutely not. -advocacy is a working
list and not a virtual water cooler.

--
-- Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://www.pgexperts.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Yeb Havinga 2010-05-14 17:09:17 Re: List traffic
Previous Message Kevin Grittner 2010-05-14 16:20:19 Re: List traffic

Browse pgsql-chat by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Yeb Havinga 2010-05-14 17:09:17 Re: List traffic
Previous Message Kevin Grittner 2010-05-14 16:20:19 Re: List traffic

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Yeb Havinga 2010-05-14 17:09:17 Re: List traffic
Previous Message Kevin Grittner 2010-05-14 16:20:19 Re: List traffic

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Yeb Havinga 2010-05-14 17:09:17 Re: List traffic
Previous Message Kevin Grittner 2010-05-14 16:20:19 Re: List traffic