Re: primary/secondary/master/slave/standby

From: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
To: "David Fetter" <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: primary/secondary/master/slave/standby
Date: 2010-05-12 16:45:25
Message-ID: 4BEA94D50200002500031637@gw.wicourts.gov
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> wrote:

> How about origin/subscriber?

Seems like a mixed metaphor. Publisher normally goes with
subscriber. I've heard and used origin and replica.

Are we planning to support a subscriber which also publishes (to
randomly pick one for purposes of discussion)? If so, that should
be considered in our choice of terminology.

-Kevin

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2010-05-12 16:49:13 Re: max_standby_delay considered harmful
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-05-12 16:39:53 Re: primary/secondary/master/slave/standby