On 07.05.2010 21:21, dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org wrote:
> Sorry - missed that. I generally prefer to only include SQL DDL for
> things that are non-default.
I generally agree. I see the "complete" variant as an option. The
"compact" (non-default SQL DDL) version is what would make my work easier.
However, at the time being we have a mixture. How would you define
"non-default"?
Regards
Erwin