Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH versus rpath

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Andy Colson <andy(at)squeakycode(dot)net>
Subject: Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH versus rpath
Date: 2010-05-06 12:37:06
Message-ID: 4BE2B7F2.2070309@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


Greg Stark wrote
>
> We only set RPATH if the install location isn't part of the default ld
> library path specified by /etc/ld.so.conf right? Setting it if it is
> in the default path would be antisocial.
>
>

How are we going to know at build time what is in the ld.soconf of the
installation machine?

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Smith 2010-05-06 12:42:52 Re: max_standby_delay considered harmful
Previous Message Robert Haas 2010-05-06 12:35:53 Re: Partitioning/inherited tables vs FKs