Tom Lane wrote:
> I think a different name would help. The best idea I can come up with
> on the spur of the moment is "allow_standby_queries", but I'm not sure
> that can't be improved on. Comments?
One objection to that name is that it also works during archive
recovery, like during PITR, which is not a standby server. But that's
probably a rare use case.
+1 on changing it to something.
--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com