| From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Chris Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org> |
| Cc: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: DRAFT beta release announcement |
| Date: | 2010-04-27 22:20:14 |
| Message-ID: | 4BD7631E.2000203@agliodbs.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On 4/27/10 2:47 PM, Chris Browne wrote:
> jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com ("Joshua D. Drake") writes:
>>> * The DO() statement, allowing users to execute ad-hoc procedural statements
>> DO() support, allowing for inline? execution of procedural statements.
>>
>> Not quite sure about this one. I don't like the word ad-hoc. Dynamic?
>
> Hmm. How about...
>
> DO() enables users to execute procedural statements without requiring
> assigning function names.
>
> That's clearer, though a bit wordier.
I'd really prefer something that fits into a bullet without wrapping.
--
-- Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://www.pgexperts.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2010-04-28 05:07:05 | Re: DRAFT beta release announcement |
| Previous Message | Chris Browne | 2010-04-27 21:47:59 | Re: DRAFT beta release announcement |