| From: | John R Pierce <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Int64GetDatum |
| Date: | 2010-04-17 08:02:52 |
| Message-ID: | 4BC96B2C.5050402@hogranch.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Tom Lane wrote:
> No, but trying to build against a non-self-consistent set of files is
> bad. You really need a pg_config.h that matches the original build of
> the server, and you haven't got that. I think Greg's point is that
> trying to reverse-engineer that file is considerably more risky than
> building your own packages from scratch.
>
and once again totally concurring with what you are saying... for
laughs, I went ahead and tweaked the fields in a copy of the 32bit
pg_config.h that I suspected were obviously wrong, and rebuilt my module
against that, and it got through most of the pl/java test suite.
so I know I'm on the right track, I just need the right pg_config.h from
Bjorn and all will be well with my world.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andreas Kretschmer | 2010-04-17 09:39:28 | Re: partitioned lookup table? |
| Previous Message | Thomas Kellerer | 2010-04-16 21:18:38 | Re: How to find avg() of sum()? |