Re: Autovaccum with cost_delay does not complete on one solaris 5.10 machine

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Autovaccum with cost_delay does not complete on one solaris 5.10 machine
Date: 2010-04-15 22:52:09
Message-ID: 4BC79899.4030107@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance


> Josh, are you sure that both servers are identical in terms of both
> GUC-related and per-table autovacuum settings?

I should check per-table. GUC, yes, because the company has source
management for config files.

--
-- Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://www.pgexperts.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Crooke 2010-04-15 23:39:37 SOLVED: Re: HELP: How to tame the 8.3.x JDBC driver with a biq guery result set
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-04-15 22:48:17 Re: Autovaccum with cost_delay does not complete on one solaris 5.10 machine