| From: | Craig Ringer <craig(at)postnewspapers(dot)com(dot)au> |
|---|---|
| To: | John R Pierce <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: pl/java status |
| Date: | 2010-04-14 05:41:45 |
| Message-ID: | 4BC55599.5060501@postnewspapers.com.au |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
John R Pierce wrote:
> is pl/java kind of dead? I don't see much activity since years ago.
I've been a bit worried about that myself. With OpenJDK and a GPL java,
it makes a lot of sense to make Java a first-class PL in PostgreSQL.
There's a fair bit of activity from Java-using users, and there's not
really much reason Java should be restricted to the client side when the
same language can work well server-side too.
Not to mention all those Oracle users out there who're hooked on the stuff.
Of course, Java is extremely thread-happy and PostgreSQL is extremely
*not*, so perhaps there are reasons it doesn't seem to see much work. If
it's anything like working on an embedded Python interpreter...
--
Craig Ringer
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Shoaib Mir | 2010-04-14 06:44:05 | Re: Server not Starting |
| Previous Message | raghavendra t | 2010-04-14 05:35:33 | Re: Server not Starting |