Re: pl/java status

From: Craig Ringer <craig(at)postnewspapers(dot)com(dot)au>
To: John R Pierce <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pl/java status
Date: 2010-04-14 05:41:45
Message-ID: 4BC55599.5060501@postnewspapers.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

John R Pierce wrote:
> is pl/java kind of dead? I don't see much activity since years ago.

I've been a bit worried about that myself. With OpenJDK and a GPL java,
it makes a lot of sense to make Java a first-class PL in PostgreSQL.
There's a fair bit of activity from Java-using users, and there's not
really much reason Java should be restricted to the client side when the
same language can work well server-side too.

Not to mention all those Oracle users out there who're hooked on the stuff.

Of course, Java is extremely thread-happy and PostgreSQL is extremely
*not*, so perhaps there are reasons it doesn't seem to see much work. If
it's anything like working on an embedded Python interpreter...

--
Craig Ringer

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Shoaib Mir 2010-04-14 06:44:05 Re: Server not Starting
Previous Message raghavendra t 2010-04-14 05:35:33 Re: Server not Starting