Re: Running Windows on a Mac partition

From: Craig Ringer <craig(at)postnewspapers(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Joshua Berry <yoberi(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: John Gage <jsmgage(at)numericable(dot)fr>, pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Running Windows on a Mac partition
Date: 2010-03-31 14:40:51
Message-ID: 4BB35EF3.4020806@postnewspapers.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 31/03/2010 10:27 PM, Joshua Berry wrote:
> My vote would be to follow Craig Ringer's advice to run the pg server in
> a virtual machine. I'd choose something like vmware/fusion or if you
> want license free options, I think they exist that can run hosts on
> win32 and BSD/MacOS.
>
> But if you wanted to avoid dual booting altogether and
> parallels/fusion/whatever can run you win32 apps well enough, I'd run
> the server on the Mac side and let the win apps connect to it via the
> virtual network adapters. This is how I've run things on my Mac with
> decent results.

Yeah. Not having Pg in a VM is better, given the choice. It's hard to
say how trustworthy fsync() behaviour on various VMs is, for one thing.
I'd still use a VM over ntfs-on-mac or hfs+-on-windows, but running it
natively and using it over tcp/ip is always going to be preferable if
you can.

--
Craig Ringer

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Albe Laurenz 2010-03-31 14:44:40 Re: Res: COPY ERROR
Previous Message Joshua Berry 2010-03-31 14:27:33 Re: Running Windows on a Mac partition