Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Lock Wait Statistics (next commitfest)

From: Mark Kirkwood <mark(dot)kirkwood(at)catalyst(dot)net(dot)nz>
To: Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)paradise(dot)net(dot)nz>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, gokul007(at)gmail(dot)com
Subject: Re: Lock Wait Statistics (next commitfest)
Date: 2010-02-27 10:40:24
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Greg Smith wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> What happened to this patch?
> Returned with feedback in October after receiving a lot of review, no 
> updated version submitted since then:

Hmm - I would say a bit of review rather than a lot :-)

The feeling I received from the various comments was a lukewarm level of 
interest at best, so I must confess that I let other things take 
precedence. Also I was after some clear feedback about whether a 
separate stats utility was necessary at all given we have Dtrace support 
- despite this not being available for Linux... and the only comment 
dealing to this concern is from Gokul just now!

I'd also like to take the opportunity to express a little frustration 
about the commitfest business - really all I wanted was the patch 
*reviewed* as WIP - it seemed that in order to do that I needed to enter 
it into the various commitfests... then I was faced with comments to the 
effect that it was not ready for commit so should not have been entered 
into a commifest at all... sigh, a bit of an enthusiasm killer I'm afraid...



In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Rémi ZaraDate: 2010-02-27 13:40:13
Subject: Re: NaN/Inf fix for ECPG
Previous:From: Heikki LinnakangasDate: 2010-02-27 09:33:34
Subject: Re: Hot Standby query cancellation and Streaming Replication integration

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group