| From: | Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | elias ghanem <e(dot)ghanem(at)acteos(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Multiple data base on same server |
| Date: | 2010-02-26 13:03:33 |
| Message-ID: | 4B87C6A5.6040005@archonet.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On 26/02/10 12:45, elias ghanem wrote:
> Hi,
> Thanks for your answer,
> Concerning the second point, each db have different table that are logically
> related (for ex, tables for configuration, tables for business...) plus I'm
> planning to put the indexes on their own tablespaces.
> Concerning the disks I will maybe stored on multiple disks (but surely not
> 200-300). So I'm just wondering If this big number of tablespaces on a same
> db server may cause problems,
If the tablespaces aren't on different disks, I'm not sure what the
point is.
Do you perhaps mean schemas? So you have e.g. a "system" schema with
tables "users", "activity_log" etc? There's no problem with 20-30
schemas per database.
--
Richard Huxton
Archonet Ltd
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kevin Grittner | 2010-02-26 13:09:03 | Re: bgwriter, checkpoints, curious (seeing delays) |
| Previous Message | elias ghanem | 2010-02-26 12:45:50 | Re: Multiple data base on same server |