| From: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Move documentation of all recovery.conf option to a new chapter. |
| Date: | 2010-02-24 19:03:07 |
| Message-ID: | 4B8577EB.8000802@enterprisedb.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
Simon Riggs wrote:
> Which is why, in the next paragraph, I proposed a way forwards...
Oh, sorry.
> There are 3 use cases: PITR, file-based replication and streaming
> replication. Having 3 separate sections would be less confusing since it
> would allow focused examples. A final section could be the "master
> reference" for defining those parameters. So having both separate and
> combined sections may end up being less confusing.
Isn't that pretty much what we have now, except that both file-based
replication and streaming replication are under the HA section? Can you
lay out a tree of the section titles you're suggesting?
--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | User Gsmet | 2010-02-24 20:25:05 | pgfouine - pgfouine: fixed [#1010690] Incorrect results in report. |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2010-02-24 18:53:56 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Move documentation of all recovery.conf option to a new chapter. |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Gokulakannan Somasundaram | 2010-02-24 19:04:40 | Re: A thought on Index Organized Tables |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2010-02-24 19:02:30 | Re: pg_stop_backup does not complete |