Re: pretty print viewdefs

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, decibel <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pretty print viewdefs
Date: 2010-02-23 15:59:10
Message-ID: 4B83FB4E.90600@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian wrote:
> What happened to this? I didn't see it applied.
>
>

I got puzzled by some delphic comments, and then I got pulled into work
of a higher priority, so it slipped down my list.

Maybe we can pick it up again in 9.1.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Steve Atkins 2010-02-23 16:02:04 Re: tie user processes to postmaster was:(Re: [HACKERS] scheduler in core)
Previous Message Kevin Grittner 2010-02-23 15:40:34 Re: function side effects