Re: NaN/Inf fix for ECPG

From: Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at>
To: Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: NaN/Inf fix for ECPG
Date: 2010-02-16 11:16:34
Message-ID: 4B7A7E92.1000800@cybertec.at
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

buildfarm member "pika" fails the NaN test.
Does FreeBSD/MIPS really return true for isinf(NaN)?
Anyway, the attached patch tries to fix the test case
by testing isnan() first and doesn't check isinf()
if isnan() returned true.

Best regards,
Zoltán Böszörményi

--
Bible has answers for everything. Proof:
"But let your communication be, Yea, yea; Nay, nay: for whatsoever is more
than these cometh of evil." (Matthew 5:37) - basics of digital technology.
"May your kingdom come" - superficial description of plate tectonics

----------------------------------
Zoltán Böszörményi
Cybertec Schönig & Schönig GmbH
http://www.postgresql.at/

Attachment Content-Type Size
pg85-ecpg-fix-nan-inf-10-ctxdiff.patch text/x-patch 1.6 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Boszormenyi Zoltan 2010-02-16 11:21:34 Re: NaN/Inf fix for ECPG
Previous Message Greg Stark 2010-02-16 10:36:50 Re: Explain buffers display units.