Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: CommitFest Status Summary - 2010-02-14

From: KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: CommitFest Status Summary - 2010-02-14
Date: 2010-02-16 05:10:00
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
(2010/02/14 13:34), Robert Haas wrote:
> * Fix large object support in pg_dump.  I think this is just waiting
> for a second opinion on whether the approach is correct.  I've been
> meaning to look at it, but haven't gotten enough round tuits; maybe
> someone else would like to take a look?  This is an open item, so we
> should really try to deal with it.

Do I have anything I can work on this right now?

Because I'll be unavailable at the next week, I'd like to fix up it
within this week, if possible.
OSS Platform Development Division, NEC
KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Fujii MasaoDate: 2010-02-16 05:19:15
Subject: Re: Re: [BUGS] BUG #4566: pg_stop_backup() reports incorrect STOP WAL LOCATION
Previous:From: Jeff DavisDate: 2010-02-16 04:06:27
Subject: libpq PGresult object and encoding

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group