| From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com>, Marko Tiikkaja <marko(dot)tiikkaja(at)cs(dot)helsinki(dot)fi>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: damage control mode |
| Date: | 2010-02-08 17:34:54 |
| Message-ID: | 4B704B3E.2030005@agliodbs.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2/8/10 7:31 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
>> Eh? Previously we allowed code to go in with documentation to be
>> written after feature freeze. Is this no longer acceptable?
My $0.0201115:
Depends on the feature, I'd say. If it's sufficiently obvious to test
the feature without full documentation, then sure. If, however,
reviewers can't adequately test the patch because they don't know all of
the syntax being implemented, then docs are a requirement.
--Josh Berkus
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2010-02-08 17:38:55 | Re: Order of operations in lazy_vacuum_rel |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2010-02-08 17:29:39 | Order of operations in lazy_vacuum_rel |