Re: Limited Shared Buffer Problem

From: Richard Neill <rn214(at)cam(dot)ac(dot)uk>
To:
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Limited Shared Buffer Problem
Date: 2010-01-29 16:53:01
Message-ID: 4B63126D.5080303@cam.ac.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

**Rod MacNeil wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I have a server running CentOS5 with 6gb of memory that will run
> postgres 8.3 exclusively.
> I would like to allocate 4gb of the memory to shared buffers for postgres.

It might be worth pausing at this point:

The various postgresql tuning guides usually suggest that on a dedicated
system, you should give postgres about 1/4 of the RAM for shared
buffers, while telling it that the effective_cache_size = 1/2 RAM.

Postgres will make good use of the OS cache as a file-cache - the
"effective_cache_size" setting is advisory to postgres that it can
expect about this much data to be in RAM.

Also, If you are setting up a new system, it's probably worth going for
8.4.2. Postgres is relatively easy to build from source.

HTH,

Richard

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Scott Marlowe 2010-01-29 17:18:15 Re: Limited Shared Buffer Problem
Previous Message **Rod MacNeil 2010-01-29 16:37:55 Limited Shared Buffer Problem