| From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Selena Deckelmann <selenamarie(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Dividing progress/debug information in pg_standby, and stat before copy |
| Date: | 2010-01-26 00:12:52 |
| Message-ID: | 4B5E3384.7060504@agliodbs.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 1/25/10 4:09 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
>> [ Greg and Selena discuss filing some rough edges off pg_standby ]
>
> Maybe I'm missing something, but I thought pg_standby would be mostly
> dead once SR hits the streets. Is it worth spending lots of time on?
>
> The ideas all sound good, I'm just wondering if it's useful effort
> at this point.
Well, if we offer HS separately from SR, it ought to work, don't you
think? It's possible that some of our users may prefer just HS.
--Josh Berkus
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Greg Smith | 2010-01-26 00:29:29 | Re: Dividing progress/debug information in pg_standby, and stat before copy |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2010-01-26 00:09:57 | Re: Dividing progress/debug information in pg_standby, and stat before copy |