| From: | Craig Ringer <craig(at)postnewspapers(dot)com(dot)au> |
|---|---|
| To: | elias ghanem <e(dot)ghanem(at)acteos(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Slow update query |
| Date: | 2010-01-22 03:22:36 |
| Message-ID: | 4B5919FC.1070903@postnewspapers.com.au |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
elias ghanem wrote:
> Actually this query is inside a function and this function is called
> from a .sh file using the following syntax: psql -h $DB_HOST -p $DB_PORT
> -d $DB_NAME -U $DB_USER -c "SELECT testupdate()"
>
> (the function is called 100 times with a vacuum analyze after each call
> for the table).
>
> So the average execution time of the function is around 2.5 mins,
> meaning that the update query (+ the vacuum) takes 2.5 mins to execute.
> So is this a normal behavior? (The same function in oracle with the same
> environment (with our vacuum obviously) is executed in 11 second).
It might be worth measuring using psql's \timing to see how long the
update and the vacuum take individually.
--
Craig Ringer
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Craig Ringer | 2010-01-22 03:46:07 | Re: Data Set Growth causing 26+hour runtime, on what we believe to be very simple SQL |
| Previous Message | Greg Smith | 2010-01-22 00:13:01 | Re: ext4 finally doing the right thing |