Re: 8.5 vs. 9.0, Postgres vs. PostgreSQL

From: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
To: "Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>
Cc: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 8.5 vs. 9.0, Postgres vs. PostgreSQL
Date: 2010-01-21 16:54:03
Message-ID: 4B58324B020000250002E986@gw.wicourts.gov
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-hackers pgsql-hackers

"Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com> wrote:

> many people are loathe to see the discussion come up again,
> but as long as the project is saddled with its ugly and
> unweildy official name, it has a large problem.

I don't particularly like the official stance on pronouncing it, but
other than that I see no problem. Just pronounce the "QL" in
PostgreSQL the same way you do the "b" in subtle and have done with
it. I'm not for changing the spelling of either one.

-Kevin

In response to

Browse pgadmin-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2010-01-21 16:59:58 Re: 8.5 vs. 9.0, Postgres vs. PostgreSQL
Previous Message Greg Sabino Mullane 2010-01-21 16:39:14 Re: 8.5 vs. 9.0, Postgres vs. PostgreSQL

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2010-01-21 16:57:18 Re: quoting psql varible as identifier
Previous Message Greg Sabino Mullane 2010-01-21 16:39:14 Re: 8.5 vs. 9.0, Postgres vs. PostgreSQL