| From: | Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: 8.5 vs. 9.0 |
| Date: | 2010-01-21 10:36:59 |
| Message-ID: | 4B582E4B.8090603@archonet.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgadmin-hackers pgsql-hackers |
On 21/01/10 09:37, Dave Page wrote:
> In an attempt to pre-empt the normally drawn-out discussions about
> what the next version of PostgreSQL will be numbered. the core team
> have discussed the issue and following a lenghty debate lasting
> literally a few minutes decided that the next release shall be....
>
> Wait for it....
>
> 9.0.
You don't have a code-name. All the cool kids have code-names for their
projects.
There - that should distract everyone from actual release-related work
for the next week or so :-)
--
Richard Huxton
Archonet Ltd
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dave Page | 2010-01-21 10:39:39 | Re: 8.5 vs. 9.0 |
| Previous Message | Massa, Harald Armin | 2010-01-21 09:47:18 | Re: 8.5 vs. 9.0 |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dave Page | 2010-01-21 10:39:39 | Re: 8.5 vs. 9.0 |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2010-01-21 10:21:15 | Re: An example of bugs for Hot Standby |