Re: Inserting 8MB bytea: just 25% of disk perf used?

From: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
To: "fkater(at)googlemail(dot)com" <fkater(at)googlemail(dot)com>
Cc: <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Scott Carey" <scott(at)richrelevance(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Inserting 8MB bytea: just 25% of disk perf used?
Date: 2010-01-19 15:13:51
Message-ID: 4B5577CF020000250002E746@gw.wicourts.gov
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

"fkater(at)googlemail(dot)com" <fkater(at)googlemail(dot)com> wrote:
> Scott Carey:
>
>> You are CPU bound.
>>
>> 30% of 4 cores is greater than 25%. 25% is one core fully
>> used.
>
> I have measured the cores separately. Some of them reached
> 30%. I am not CPU bound here.

If you have numbers like that when running one big query, or a
stream of queries one-at-a-time, you are CPU bound. A single
request only uses one CPU at a time although it could switch among a
number of them, if the OS doesn't make an effort to keep each
process with the same CPU.

-Kevin

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2010-01-19 15:25:46 Re: [HACKERS] Re: Faster CREATE DATABASE by delaying fsync (was 8.4.1 ubuntu karmic slow createdb)
Previous Message Andres Freund 2010-01-19 15:03:16 Re: [HACKERS] Re: Faster CREATE DATABASE by delaying fsync (was 8.4.1 ubuntu karmic slow createdb)