| From: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Streaming replication and non-blocking I/O |
| Date: | 2010-01-15 21:09:48 |
| Message-ID: | 4B50D99C.4050907@enterprisedb.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> I wrote:
>> I think it's a tools/build process problem and should be attacked that
>> way.
>
> Specifically, I think you missed out $(BE_DLLLIBS) in SHLIB_LINK.
> We'll find out at the next mingw build...
Thanks. But what is BE_DLLLIBS? I can't find any description of it.
I suspect the MinGW build will fail because of the missing PGDLLIMPORTs.
Before we sprinkle all the global variables it touches with that, let me
explain what I meant by dividing walreceiver code differently between
dynamically loaded module and backend code. Right now I have to go to
sleep, though, but I'll try to get back to during the weekend.
--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kevin Grittner | 2010-01-15 21:09:52 | Re: Testing with concurrent sessions |
| Previous Message | Kevin Grittner | 2010-01-15 20:53:44 | Re: Testing with concurrent sessions |