| From: | Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: improving log management |
| Date: | 2010-01-14 12:29:19 |
| Message-ID: | 4B4F0E1F.6030905@timbira.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane escreveu:
> (1) Windows compatibility?
>
Yes.
> (2) What happens if the command takes a significant amount of time to
> execute? We can't afford to have the log collector blocked.
>
You're right. We can't have that command in the same process because DBAs
could have high values for log_rotation_* parameters or resources could become
unavailable. :( One idea is to have another process (logger worker) to execute
it. Also we need to store the logfiles that were already rotated.
> (3) What do you intend those %p and %f symbols to signify?
>
%p and %f are relative log path and log filename, respectively.
--
Euler Taveira de Oliveira
http://www.timbira.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Aidan Van Dyk | 2010-01-14 12:39:51 | Re: plpython3 |
| Previous Message | Matteo Beccati | 2010-01-14 12:23:31 | Re: mailing list archiver chewing patches |