Re: a heavy duty operation on an "unused" table kills my server

From: Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com>
To: Eduardo Piombino <drakorg(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Craig James <craig_james(at)emolecules(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: a heavy duty operation on an "unused" table kills my server
Date: 2010-01-13 14:06:57
Message-ID: 4B4DD381.6070302@timbira.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Eduardo Piombino escreveu:
> Maybe it does not get logged at all until the ALTER is completed?
>
This feature [1] was implemented a few months ago and it will be available
only in the next PostgreSQL version (8.5).

[1] http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2009-11/msg00018.php

--
Euler Taveira de Oliveira
http://www.timbira.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2010-01-13 14:45:11 Re: [PERFORMANCE] work_mem vs temp files issue
Previous Message Craig Ringer 2010-01-13 10:58:43 Re: a heavy duty operation on an "unused" table kills my server