Re: Testing plperl<->plperlu interaction

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Tim Bunce <Tim(dot)Bunce(at)pobox(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, decibel <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Testing plperl<->plperlu interaction
Date: 2010-01-09 02:21:43
Message-ID: 4B47E837.6020900@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


Tom Lane wrote:
>
> Hm ... I wonder how badly this fails if perl isn't present?
>
> Before you say that that won't matter, consider "make clean" etc.
> The makefile does have to parse.
>
> It might be sufficient to wrap this test in an "ifneq ($(PERL),)"
> or similar.
>

OK, can do that.

> Also, some commentary connecting this test to plperl.c's support for
> two interpreters would be a good thing.
>
>
>

ITYM in the .sql file(s)?

I also see that I'll have to make a small adjustment in the MSVC build
programs.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2010-01-09 02:34:49 Re: Testing plperl<->plperlu interaction
Previous Message Euler Taveira de Oliveira 2010-01-09 02:21:34 Re: Add .gitignore files to CVS?