| From: | Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc> |
|---|---|
| To: | Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Streaming replication and postmaster signaling |
| Date: | 2010-01-08 07:27:59 |
| Message-ID: | 4B46DE7F.3040607@kaltenbrunner.cc |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Greg Sabino Mullane wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: RIPEMD160
>
>
>> while I agree that HS is very useful without SR, I think that it's
>> mostly the well known powerusers inthe community are actively waiting
>> for HS and not so much for SR. For the typical user outside of -hackers
>> or even -general I'm not so sure about that...
>
> Well, I can state that we have plenty of clients that would be very
> interested in HS, but none that would really care if it came without
> SR. This power user knows a lot of people outside of -hackers and
> - -general and they are what I'm basing my opinion on. :)
that is more or less my point but maybe I phrased it badly :) Real
database powerusers are mostly interested in HS. THe people that are
coming from a different background or maybe MySQL are likely going to
find something that requires doing a base backup, implementing wal
shipping and installing pg_standby(or some other custom scripts) akward...
Stefan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Fujii Masao | 2010-01-08 08:10:21 | ACK from walreceiver to walsender |
| Previous Message | Greg Smith | 2010-01-08 07:17:59 | Re: damage control mode |