| From: | "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> |
|---|---|
| To: | <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>,<tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>,<peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Testing with concurrent sessions |
| Date: | 2010-01-07 02:43:24 |
| Message-ID: | 4B44F5EC020000250002DE4B@gw.wicourts.gov |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> We have not yet fully accepted the notion that you must have Perl
> to build (and, in fact, I am right now trying to verify that you
> don't). I don't think that requiring Perl to test is going to fly.
Well, if that's the consensus, I have to choose between trying to
implement multi-session psql and using testing which can't carry over
to long-term regular use. Are we anywhere close to an agreement on
what the multi-session psql implementation would look like? (If not
I can put something forward.)
-Kevin
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Greg Stark | 2010-01-07 02:49:14 | Re: Bug with PATHs having non-ASCII characters |
| Previous Message | Kevin Grittner | 2010-01-07 02:31:20 | Re: Testing with concurrent sessions |