Re: pg_connect takes 3.0 seconds

From: Craig James <craig_james(at)emolecules(dot)com>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_connect takes 3.0 seconds
Date: 2010-01-06 18:31:12
Message-ID: 4B44D6F0.3090107@emolecules.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Dave Crooke wrote:
> The fact that the delays are clustered at (3 + 0.2 n) seconds, rather
> than a distributed range, strongly indicates a timeout and not
> (directly) a resource issue.
>
> 3 seconds is too fast for a timeout on almost any DNS operation, unless
> it has been modified, so I'd suspect it's the TCP layer, e.g. perhaps
> the SYN packet goes awol and it has to retry.
>
> I'd second the vote for investigation with a packet sniffing tool
> (Wireshark, tcpdump, etc)

If you have a PC (Windows), pingplotter is a remarkable and simple tool to use that quickly identifies problems, and gives results that are convincing when you show them to your network admin. Wireshark and tcpdump have a pretty steep learning curve and are overkill if your problem is simple.

Craig

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jesper Krogh 2010-01-06 19:10:34 Digesting explain analyze
Previous Message Dave Crooke 2010-01-06 17:04:03 Re: pg_connect takes 3.0 seconds