Re: BUG #5259: the table name double

From: Craig Ringer <craig(at)postnewspapers(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Goodomens <goodomens(at)21cn(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-bugs <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: BUG #5259: the table name double
Date: 2010-01-04 11:26:35
Message-ID: 4B41D06B.5030108@postnewspapers.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

On 4/01/2010 6:18 PM, Goodomens wrote:
> Craig Ringer
> I come from Shanghai of China,my english is not well,sorry.
> >Is this the output of psql's `\dp' command? If so, where are the actual
> >privelege rows - did you delete them, or is the output you pasted
> >actually EXACTLY what came out of psql?
> yes ,is \dp command .
> >What version of the ancient and approaching-retirement 8.0 are you
> >using? "select pg_version()".
> select pg_version();
> ERROR: function pg_version() does not exist
> HINT: No function matches the given name and argument types. You may
> need to add explicit type casts.

Whoops, sorry - I meant "select version();"

> [root(at)db207 pgsql]# more PG_VERSION
> 8.0

Yes, but there's a patch level that doesn't affect compatibility with
the database files and thus isn't in PG_VERSION. Your server might be
missing major and important bug fixes if it's an older version.

--
Craig Ringer

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Takesver Kumar Thakur 2010-01-04 13:44:21 BUG #5261: Invalide page header
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2010-01-04 10:36:27 Re: BUG #5258: Unique and foreign key constraints fail on columns with reserved names, but not check constraints