Re: join ordering via Simulated Annealing

From: Jan Urbański <wulczer(at)wulczer(dot)org>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: join ordering via Simulated Annealing
Date: 2009-12-28 12:13:18
Message-ID: 4B38A0DE.6040002@wulczer.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andres Freund wrote:
> On Wednesday 23 December 2009 02:23:55 Jan Urbański wrote:

>> Lastly, I'm lacking good testcases

> If you want to see some queries which are rather hard to plan with random
> search you can look at
> http://archives.postgresql.org/message-
> id/200907091700(dot)43411(dot)andres(at)anarazel(dot)de
> which tom analyzed and improved here http://archives.postgresql.org/message-
> id/17807(dot)1247932094(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us

Thanks, these look like good testing candidates, not least because they
trigger assertion errors with my code :( I'll report back when they're
fixed...

> Robert had another example in
> 603c8f070911271205r4d4534edt1cebcb76ff5066a5(at)mail(dot)gmail(dot)com that might be
> interesting.

Yes, I rememberd this one, will try to put them through the mill as soon
as I fix my code.

Cheers,
Jan

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2009-12-28 12:40:56 Re: updateMinRecoveryPoint bug?
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2009-12-28 10:55:50 Re: Streaming Rep - 2-phase backups and reducing time to full replication