Re: TAP output format in pg_regress

From: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
To: vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Nikolay Shaplov <dhyan(at)nataraj(dot)su>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker <ilmari(at)ilmari(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Subject: Re: TAP output format in pg_regress
Date: 2023-01-23 11:42:57
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On 19 Jan 2023, at 12:14, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> The patch does not apply on top of HEAD as in [1], please post a rebased patch:

The attached v16 is a rebase on top of current master which resolves the
conflict which came from the recent commit removing the "ignore" functionality.
It also fixes a few small things pointed out off-list.

Daniel Gustafsson

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daniel Gustafsson 2023-01-23 11:43:41 Re: TAP output format in pg_regress
Previous Message John Naylor 2023-01-23 11:20:06 Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum