Re: SE-PostgreSQL/Lite Review

From: Joshua Brindle <method(at)manicmethod(dot)com>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Cc: KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>, KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: SE-PostgreSQL/Lite Review
Date: 2009-12-11 18:28:17
Message-ID: 4B228F41.7010102@manicmethod.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Stephen Frost wrote:
> KaiGai,
>
<snip>
> I do think that, technically, there's no reason we couldn't allow for
> multiple "only-more-restrictive" models to be enabled and built in a
> single binary for systems which support it. As such, I would make those
> just "#if defined()" rather than "#elif". Let it be decided at runtime
> which are actually used, otherwise it becomes a much bigger problem for
> packagers too.
>

It isn't just a case of using #if and it magically working. You'd need a
system to manage multiple labels on each object that can be addressed by
different systems. So instead of having an object mapped only to
"system_u:object_r:mydb_t:s15" you'd also have to have it mapped to,
eg., "^" for Smack.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2009-12-11 18:52:44 Re: Adding support for SE-Linux security
Previous Message David P. Quigley 2009-12-11 18:17:00 Re: Adding support for SE-Linux security