Re: Recommended/Not Recommended Hosts?

From: Brian Ghidinelli <brian(at)pukkasoft(dot)com>
To: SF Postgres <sfpug(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Recommended/Not Recommended Hosts?
Date: 2009-12-10 20:05:49
Message-ID: 4B21549D.8080600@pukkasoft.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: sfpug


Fred Moyer wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 10:43 AM, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
>> For my part, I've had reasonably good experiences with:
>>
>> -- Layer42 for low-end colo, but watch your bandwith, they won't.
>
> At the risk of giving away one of my best kept secrets, Layer42 is
> simply the most outstanding and professional colocation provider I
> have ever had the pleasure to work with. Their network is FAST and
> unbelievably reliable. Steve and his team are of the highest caliber.

I've been at Layer 42 for five years so I do believe they provide a good
service for the price. It's worth noting however they have suffered at
least two full power outages over the past couple of years. While they
have been brief (~seconds), they cause hardware to power cycle and we've
had hardware failures each time. The most recent outage was in September.

Brian

In response to

Browse sfpug by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Steve Atkins 2009-12-10 21:55:45 Re: Recommended/Not Recommended Hosts?
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2009-12-10 19:59:39 Re: Recommended/Not Recommended Hosts?