Re: explain output infelicity in psql

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Ron Mayer <rm_pg(at)cheapcomplexdevices(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: explain output infelicity in psql
Date: 2009-12-10 17:07:09
Message-ID: 4B212ABD.7060602@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Ron Mayer wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>
>> Robert Haas escribió:
>>
>>> On first blush, I'm inclined to suggest that the addition of + signs
>>> to mark continuation lines is a misfeature.
>>>
>> EXPLAIN is a special case. IMHO it should be dealt with accordingly.
>>
>>
>
> Is it?
>
> Wouldn't it affect anyone who stuck XML in a txt column and wanted
> to copy and paste it into a parser?
>
> Perhaps single column output usually won't want the + signs (because
> it's copy&pasteable) but multi-column output could?
>

Yeah, I'm thinking we should probably suppress output of format.nl_right
(no matter what the format) where there is only one column. (This is
even uglier with unicode linestyle, btw). That's a sane rule and it's
not an ugly hack.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2009-12-10 17:08:01 Re: explain output infelicity in psql
Previous Message Kevin Grittner 2009-12-10 17:01:05 Re: tsearch parser inefficiency if text includes urls or emails - new version