Tom Lane wrote:
*SNIP*
> So about 55% of the time is going into affix pattern matching.
> I wonder whether that couldn't be made faster. A lot of the cycles
> are spent on coping with variable-length characters --- perhaps the
> ispell code should convert to wchar representation before doing this?
Thanks a lot for looking into this. I hope this will lead to some
improvements one day.
Unfortunately my C skills were pretty basic years ago and I haven't used
the language since, so I can't be of much help..
cheers,
Wojciech Knapik