| From: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Summary and Plan for Hot Standby |
| Date: | 2009-11-15 14:50:03 |
| Message-ID: | 4B00151B.8070807@enterprisedb.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-11-15 at 16:07 +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
>> - If WAL recovery runs out of lock space while acquiring an
>> AccessExclusiveLock on behalf of a transaction that ran in the master,
>> it will FATAL and abort recovery, bringing down the standby. Seems like
>> it should wait/cancel queries instead.
>
> Hard resources will always be an issue. If the standby has less than it
> needs, then there will be problems. All of those can be corrected by
> increasing the resources on the standby and restarting. This effects
> max_connections, max_prepared_transactions, max_locks_per_transaction,
> as documented.
There's no safe setting for those that would let you avoid the issue. No
matter how high you set them, it will be possible for read-only backends
to consume all the lock space, causing recovery to abort and bring down
the standby.
--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2009-11-15 15:04:56 | Re: Summary and Plan for Hot Standby |
| Previous Message | Greg Stark | 2009-11-15 14:47:41 | Re: Summary and Plan for Hot Standby |