Re: Shall we just get rid of plpgsql's RENAME?

From: Craig Ringer <craig(at)postnewspapers(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: Shall we just get rid of plpgsql's RENAME?
Date: 2009-11-05 06:17:17
Message-ID: 4AF26DED.5050101@postnewspapers.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 5/11/2009 9:34 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> According to
> http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/plpgsql-declarations.html#PLPGSQL-DECLARATION-RENAMING-VARS
> the RENAME declaration in plpgsql has been known broken since PG 7.3.
> Nobody has bothered to fix it. Shall we just rip it out?

I certainly wouldn't shed a tear. Off with it's head.

--
Craig Ringer

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message tomas 2009-11-05 08:33:10 Re: Proposal - temporal contrib module
Previous Message Fujii Masao 2009-11-05 04:29:40 Re: BUG #4961: pg_standby.exe crashes with no args