Re: [PATCH] Largeobject access controls

From: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec>, KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Largeobject access controls
Date: 2009-10-15 06:20:15
Message-ID: 4AD6BF1F.2040809@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

KaiGai Kohei wrote:
> I have to focus on my patches with highest priority in CommitFest,
> but it may be possible to help reviewing the proposed patches in
> the off-fest season. It is illegal/undesirable for the process?

No, that's absolutely fine. During commitfests patch review is needed
the most, but please do help whenever you have the time.

--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2009-10-15 06:27:05 Re: CommitFest 2009-09, two weeks on
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-10-15 05:04:56 Re: Could regexp_matches be immutable?