Re: CommitFest 2009-09, two weeks on

From: KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: CommitFest 2009-09, two weeks on
Date: 2009-10-15 01:35:18
Message-ID: 4AD67C56.3070508@ak.jp.nec.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 12:24 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
> <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>>> Do you
>>> have any sense of how soon you'll feel confident to commit either
>>> patch?
>> I'm bad at estimating. Not this week for sure, and next week I'm
>> traveling and won't be able to spend as much time on it as I am right
>> now. If no new major issues are found, and all the outstanding issues
>> are resolved by me or Simon by then, maybe the week after that.
>
> It's now the week after that, so unless you're in the process of
> typing that 'cvs commit' command, I'm going to move HS + SR out to the
> next CommitFest so that we can close this one out and stamp alpha2.
>
> <brief pause for objections will now ensue>

I have a question.
When we register the postponed patches on the CF-Nov site again,
which tag should be choosen? "Needs Review"? or "Ready for Commiter"?

Thanks,
--
OSS Platform Development Division, NEC
KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Itagaki Takahiro 2009-10-15 01:38:53 Re: Buffer usage in EXPLAIN and pg_stat_statements (review)
Previous Message Robert Haas 2009-10-15 01:24:18 Re: Buffer usage in EXPLAIN and pg_stat_statements (review)