| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Emmanuel Cecchet <manu(at)asterdata(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Emmanuel Cecchet <Emmanuel(dot)Cecchet(at)asterdata(dot)com>, Selena Deckelmann <selenamarie(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: COPY enhancements |
| Date: | 2009-10-07 13:28:02 |
| Message-ID: | 4ACC9762.9070903@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Emmanuel Cecchet wrote:
> If you prefer to postpone the auto-partitioning to the next commit
> fest, I can strip it from the current patch and re-submit it for the
> next fest (but it's just 2 isolated methods really easy to review).
>
>
I certainly think this should be separated out. In general it is not a
good idea to roll distinct features together. It complicates both the
reviewing process and the discussion.
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dimitri Fontaine | 2009-10-07 13:33:01 | Re: COPY enhancements |
| Previous Message | Emmanuel Cecchet | 2009-10-07 13:12:44 | Re: COPY enhancements |